<template>
<div>{{ displayString }}</div>
</template>
<script setup>
import { defineProps } from 'vue';
const props = defineProps({
displayString: String
});
</script>














Compare Declarative Frameworks





@Composable
fun MyComponent(
displayString: String
) {
Text(displayString)
}
function MyComponent(props) {
return <div>{props.displayString}</div>;
}
<template>
<p v-if="condition">Condition is true</p>
<p v-else>Condition is false</p>
</template>
<script setup>
import { defineProps } from 'vue';
const props = defineProps({
condition: Boolean
});
</script>
@Composable
fun ConditionalComponent(condition: Boolean) {
if (condition) {
Text("Condition is true")
} else {
Text("Condition is false")
}
}
// Usage
ConditionalComponent(condition = true)
function ConditionalComponent({ condition }) {
return (
<>
{condition ? (
<p>Condition is true</p>
) : (
<p>Condition is false</p>
)}
</>
);
}
// Usage
<ConditionalComponent condition={true} />;
<template>
<intermediate-component :data="data" />
</template>
<script setup>
import { defineProps } from 'vue';
import IntermediateComponent from './IntermediateComponent.vue';
const props = defineProps({
data: String
});
</script>
@Composable
fun Parent(data: String) {
IntermediateComponent(data = data)
}
@Composable
fun IntermediateComponent(data: String) {
ChildComponent(data = data)
}
@Composable
fun ChildComponent(data: String) {
Text("Received data: $data")
}
// Usage
Parent(data = "Some data")
function Parent({ data }) {
return <IntermediateComponent data={data} />;
}
function IntermediateComponent({ data }) {
return <ChildComponent data={data} />;
}
function ChildComponent({ data }) {
return <p>Received data: {data}</p>;
}
// Usage
<Parent data="Some data" />;
<template>
<button @click="setClicked">
{{ clicked ? "Button clicked" : "Click me" }}
</button>
</template>
<script setup>
import { ref } from 'vue';
const clicked = ref(false);
function setClicked() {
clicked.value = true;
}
</script>
@Composable
fun ClickableComponent() {
var clicked by remember { mutableStateOf(false) }
Button(onClick = { clicked = true }) {
Text(if (clicked) "Button clicked" else "Click me")
}
}
import { useState } from "react";
function ClickableComponent() {
const [clicked, setClicked] = useState(false);
return (
<button onClick={() => setClicked(true)}>
{clicked ? "Button clicked" : "Click me"}
</button>
);
}
<template>
<input
type="text"
v-model="text"
placeholder="Enter text"
/>
</template>
<script setup>
import { ref } from 'vue';
const text = ref('');
</script>
@Composable
fun TextInputComponent() {
var text by remember { mutableStateOf("") }
TextField(
value = text,
onValueChange = { newText -> text = newText },
label = { Text("Enter text") }
)
}
function TextInputComponent() {
const [text, setText] = useState("");
return (
<input
type="text"
value={text}
onChange={(e) => setText(e.target.value)}
placeholder="Enter text"
/>
);
}
Vue.js doesn't have a built-in preview feature. However, you can use a tool like Storybook to create previews for your components in a separate development environment.
@Composable
fun ExampleComponent() {
Text("Hello, World!")
}
@Preview(showBackground = true)
@Composable
fun ExampleComponentPreview() {
ExampleComponent()
}
Additionally, you can also use Showkase, an open source library by Airbnb that allows you to view themes preview functions in an auto-generated component browser that can be viewed on an Android device.
React doesn't have a built-in preview feature. However, you can use a tool like Storybook to create previews for your components in a separate development environment.
<template>
<ul>
<li v-for="item in items" :key="item">
{{ item }}
</li>
</ul>
</template>
<script setup>
import { defineProps } from 'vue';
const props = defineProps({
items: Array
});
</script>
<!-- Usage -->
<list-component :items="['Item 1', 'Item 2', 'Item 3']"></list-component>
@Composable
fun ListComponent(items: List<String>) {
LazyColumn {
items(items) { item ->
Text(item)
}
}
}
// Usage
val items = listOf("Item 1", "Item 2", "Item 3")
ListComponent(items = items)
function ListComponent({ items }) {
return (
<ul>
{items.map((item) => (
<li key={item}>{item}</li>
))}
</ul>
);
}
// Usage
const items = ["Item 1", "Item 2", "Item 3"];
<ListComponent items={items} />;
<template>
<ul>
<li v-for="person in items" :key="person.id">
Name: {{ person.name }}, Age: {{ person.age }}
</li>
</ul>
</template>
<script setup>
import { defineProps } from 'vue';
const props = defineProps({
items: Array
});
</script>
<!-- Usage -->
<item-keys-example
:items="[
{ name: 'John', age: 30, id: '1' },
{ name: 'Jane', age: 28, id: '2' },
{ name: 'Bob', age: 25, id: '3' }
]"
></item-keys-example>
data class Person(val name: String, val age: Int, val id: String)
@Composable
fun ItemKeysExample(items: List<Person>) {
LazyColumn {
items(items, key = { person -> person.id }) { person ->
Text("Name: ${person.name}, Age: ${person.age}")
}
}
}
function ItemKeysExample({ items }) {
return (
<ul>
{items.map((person) => (
<li key={person.id}>
Name: {person.name}, Age: {person.age}
</li>
))}
</ul>
);
}
// Usage
<ItemKeysExample
items={[
{ name: "John", age: 30, id: "1" },
{ name: "Jane", age: 28, id: "2" },
{ name: "Bob", age: 25, id: "3" },
]}
/>;
// ParentComponent.vue
<template>
<div>
<slot name="header"></slot>
<slot name="content"></slot>
</div>
</template>
// ChildComponent.vue
<template>
<p>Child Content</p>
</template>
// Usage
<parent-component>
<template v-slot:header>
<h1>Header</h1>
</template>
<template v-slot:content>
<child />
</template>
</parent-component>
@Composable
fun Parent(
header: @Composable () -> Unit,
content: @Composable () -> Unit
) {
Column {
header()
content()
}
}
// Usage
Parent(
header = { Text("Header") },
content = { Child() }
)
@Composable
fun Child() {
Text("Child Content")
}
function Parent({ header, content }) {
return (
<div>
{header}
{content}
</div>
);
}
// Usage
<Parent header={<h1>Header</h1>} content={<Child />} />;
function Child() {
return <p>Child Content</p>;
}
Vue.js doesn't have a direct analog to modifiers in Jetpack Compose or SwiftUI. Instead, you can use inline styles or CSS classes.
<template>
<div :style="style">Hello, World!</div>
</template>
<script setup>
import { reactive } from 'vue';
const style = reactive({
padding: '16px',
backgroundColor: 'blue',
color: 'white'
});
</script>
@Composable
fun ModifiersExample() {
Text(
"Hello, World!",
modifier = Modifier
.padding(16.dp)
.background(Color.Blue)
)
}
React doesn't have a direct analog to modifiers in Jetpack Compose or SwiftUI. Instead, you can use inline styles or CSS classes.
function ModifiersExample() {
const style = {
padding: "16px",
backgroundColor: "blue",
color: "white",
};
return <div style={style}>Hello, World!</div>;
}
<template>
<button @click="incrementCount">
Count: {{ count }}
</button>
</template>
<script setup>
import { ref } from 'vue';
const count = ref(0);
function incrementCount() {
count.value++;
}
</script>
@Composable
fun Counter() {
var count by remember { mutableStateOf(0) }
Button(onClick = { count = count + 1 }) {
Text("Count: $count")
}
}
import { useState } from "react";
function Counter() {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
return (
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
Count: {count}
</button>
);
}
<!-- ParentComponent.vue -->
<template>
<intermediate />
</template>
<script setup>
import { provide, ref } from 'vue';
import Intermediate from './IntermediateComponent.vue';
const data = ref('Some data');
provide('dataKey', data);
</script>
<!-- IntermediateComponent.vue -->
<template>
<child />
</template>
<script setup>
import Child from './ChildComponent.vue';
</script>
<!-- ChildComponent.vue -->
<template>
<p>Received data: {{ data }}</p>
</template>
<script setup>
import { inject } from 'vue';
const data = inject('dataKey');
</script>
<!-- Usage -->
<parent-component data="Some data"></parent-component>
val CustomLocal = compositionLocalOf<String> { "Default data" }
@Composable
fun Parent(data: String) {
CompositionLocalProvider(CustomLocal provides data) {
Intermediate()
}
}
@Composable
fun Intermediate() {
Child()
}
@Composable
fun Child() {
val data = CustomLocal.current
Text("Received data: $data")
}
// Usage
Parent(data = "Some data")
import { createContext, useContext } from "react";
const CustomContext = createContext();
function Parent({ data }) {
return (
<CustomContext.Provider value={data}>
<Intermediate />
</CustomContext.Provider>
);
}
function Intermediate() {
return <Child />;
}
function Child() {
const data = useContext(CustomContext);
return <p>Received data: {data}</p>;
}
// Usage
<Parent data="Some data" />;
<template>
<div></div>
</template>
<script setup>
import { onMounted } from 'vue';
onMounted(() => {
// Perform side effect here
});
</script>
@Composable
fun SideEffectOnLoadComponent() {
LaunchedEffect(Unit) {
// Perform side effect, e.g. fetch data, update external data source
}
// Other UI components
Text("Hello, World!")
}
import { useEffect } from "react";
function SideEffectOnLoadComponent() {
useEffect(() => {
// Perform side effect, e.g. fetch data, update external data source
}, []);
// Other UI components
return <div />;
}
Frequently Asked Questions About Vue.js vs Jetpack Compose vs React
Which is better for beginners, Vue.js or Jetpack Compose or React?
Let's analyze the learning curve and requirements for each framework in 2025:
Vue.js (5/5)
Vue.js is highly beginner-friendly with its progressive learning curve and clear documentation. Its template syntax feels natural to HTML developers, while the Composition API offers a powerful way to organize complex logic. The framework provides official solutions for common needs, reducing decision fatigue.
Learning Path:
- Learn Vue template syntax and directives
- Understand component system
- Master Composition API
- Learn Vue Router and state management
- Practice Vue best practices and patterns
Key Prerequisites:
- HTML/CSS
- JavaScript basics
- npm/yarn
Time to Productivity: 1-2 months for web developers, 2-3 months for beginners
React (4/5)
React's component-based architecture and extensive ecosystem make it accessible for beginners. While concepts like hooks and virtual DOM require time to master, the large community and abundance of learning resources help overcome challenges. TypeScript adoption adds type safety but increases the initial learning curve.
Learning Path:
- Learn modern JavaScript/TypeScript
- Understand React components and JSX
- Master hooks and state management
- Learn component lifecycle and effects
- Practice React patterns and best practices
Key Prerequisites:
- JavaScript/TypeScript
- HTML/CSS
- npm/yarn
Time to Productivity: 2-3 months for web developers, 3-4 months for beginners
Jetpack Compose (3/5)
Jetpack Compose has a moderate learning curve that requires understanding of Kotlin and Android fundamentals. Its functional programming approach and declarative syntax can be challenging for developers coming from imperative XML layouts, but the excellent tooling and preview system make the learning process smoother.
Learning Path:
- Learn Kotlin fundamentals (especially lambdas and higher-order functions)
- Understand Android Activity/Fragment lifecycle
- Master Compose basics (composables, state, side effects)
- Learn Material Design components and theming
- Practice state management and composition patterns
Key Prerequisites:
- Kotlin
- Android basics
- Gradle build system
Time to Productivity: 2-3 months for Android developers, 4-6 months for beginners
Recommendation
Based on the analysis, Vue.js offers the most approachable learning curve. However, your choice should depend on:
- Your existing programming background (HTML/CSS, Kotlin, JavaScript/TypeScript)
- Target platform requirements (Cross-platform, Android, Cross-platform)
- Available learning time (1-2 months for web developers, 2-3 months for beginners for Vue.js)
- Long-term career goals in mobile/web development
How does the performance of Vue.js compare to Jetpack Compose in real-world applications?
Let's analyze the real-world performance characteristics of Vue.js and Jetpack Compose based on benchmarks and practical experience:
Vue.js Performance Profile
Strengths
-
✓ Reactive system
Fine-grained reactivity system that updates only affected components.
-
✓ Virtual DOM efficiency
Optimized virtual DOM implementation with static tree hoisting.
-
✓ Template compilation
Templates are compiled into highly optimized render functions.
Areas for Optimization
-
! Complex reactivity overhead
Deep reactive objects can have performance implications.
-
! Mobile optimization
May require additional optimization for mobile web performance.
Jetpack Compose Performance Profile
Strengths
-
✓ Efficient recomposition system
Uses smart recomposition that only updates components when their inputs change, reducing unnecessary UI updates.
-
✓ Optimized rendering pipeline
Compose leverages Android's rendering pipeline to optimize performance for animations and transitions.
-
✓ Memory efficiency
Compose's compiler plugin optimizes memory allocation by reusing existing objects and reducing unnecessary allocations during UI updates.
Areas for Optimization
-
! Initial release overhead
First-time compilation and initial app startup time can be slower compared to XML layouts. You can address this by leveraging Baseline Profile.
-
! Complex state management impact
Improper state management can trigger unnecessary recompositions, affecting performance.
Performance Optimization Tips
Vue.js
- Use v-show for frequently toggled content
- Implement proper key usage in v-for directives
- Leverage Vue's keep-alive component
- Profile with Vue DevTools and Chrome Performance
Jetpack Compose
- Use remember() and derivedStateOf() to minimize recompositions
- Implement proper key() usage in lists for efficient updates
- Leverage Compose's built-in lazy loading components
- Profile with Android Studio's Layout Inspector and Performance tools
What are the key architectural differences between Vue.js and Jetpack Compose and React?
Here are the key differences between Vue.js and Jetpack Compose and React:
Feature | Vue.js | Jetpack Compose | React |
---|---|---|---|
Paradigm | Progressive JavaScript framework with a template-based approach | Declarative UI toolkit with a functional programming approach | Declarative UI library with a component-based approach |
Target Platform | Web primarily | Android (with experimental desktop support) | Web (with React Native for mobile) |
Language | JavaScript/TypeScript | Kotlin | JavaScript/TypeScript |
Component Model | Single-file components with template, script, and style sections | Composable functions | Function components with hooks or class components |
State Management | Reactive data with Composition API or Options API | State hoisting with remember and mutableStateOf | useState, useReducer, and third-party solutions like Redux |
Ecosystem | Growing ecosystem with official libraries for routing and state | Integrated with Android ecosystem and Kotlin coroutines | Vast ecosystem with many libraries and tools |
The choice between these frameworks often depends on your target platform, existing expertise, and specific project requirements. Vue.js and Jetpack Compose and React each have their strengths in different contexts.
What are the job market trends for Vue.js vs Jetpack Compose vs React in 2025?
If you're considering a career move in 2025, here's how these frameworks compare in terms of job prospects:
Vue.js
- Current Demand: Solid demand, particularly in certain markets like Asia
- Growth Trajectory: Steady growth with strong community support
- Notable Companies: Alibaba, GitLab, Grammarly, Nintendo
Jetpack Compose
- Current Demand: Growing rapidly as more Android apps transition from XML layouts
- Growth Trajectory: Strong upward trend as Google pushes it as the future of Android UI
- Notable Companies: Google, Twitter, Square, Airbnb
React
- Current Demand: Very high demand across web, mobile (React Native), and desktop
- Growth Trajectory: Mature but still growing with continuous innovation
- Notable Companies: Meta, Netflix, Airbnb, Dropbox
Between React and Vue.js, React currently has a larger job market, but Vue.js positions often have less competition. Both are excellent choices for web development careers.
Can Vue.js and Jetpack Compose and React be used together in the same project?
Understanding how Vue.js and Jetpack Compose and React can work together:
Vue.js + Jetpack Compose
There's no direct integration between Vue.js and Jetpack Compose as they target different platforms. You would typically build separate apps for web and Android.
Vue.js + React
Vue.js and React can coexist in the same web application, though this is uncommon. Micro-frontends architecture might use both frameworks for different parts of a large application.
Jetpack Compose + React
React (via React Native) can use Jetpack Compose through native modules, though this is complex. Alternatively, Compose for Web is an experimental project that brings Compose concepts to web development.
Using multiple frameworks: While it's technically possible to use Vue.js, Jetpack Compose, React in a single project ecosystem, this adds complexity. It's generally better to choose the right tool for each platform and maintain consistency within that platform.
Web + Mobile Strategy: A common approach is to use Vue.js or React for your web application, while using Jetpack Compose for mobile apps. You can share business logic and API calls between them, but the UI layer would be implemented separately for each platform.
What are the key philosophical differences between React and Vue.js?
React and Vue.js have different design philosophies that affect how you build applications:
React Philosophy
- JavaScript-centric: Uses JSX to mix HTML with JavaScript
- Explicit: State updates require explicit calls
- Functional: Embraces functional programming concepts
- Community-driven: Most solutions come from community packages
- Freedom: Minimal restrictions on how to structure your app
Vue.js Philosophy
- Template-oriented: HTML templates with enhancements
- Reactive: Automatic tracking of dependencies
- Progressive: Can be adopted incrementally
- Opinionated core: Official solutions for routing, state management
- Structure: More guidance on application architecture
Neither approach is inherently better - React's flexibility works well for complex applications with experienced teams, while Vue's structure and approachability can accelerate development for smaller teams or those new to frontend development.
How does Jetpack Compose compare to traditional Android XML layouts?
Jetpack Compose represents a significant shift from traditional Android XML layouts:
Traditional XML Layouts
- Declarative XML with imperative Java/Kotlin manipulation
- View hierarchy with expensive findViewById() calls
- Complex layouts like ConstraintLayout for performance
- Separate files for layouts, styles, and logic
- Many boilerplate adapters and view holders
- Slow layout inflation process
Jetpack Compose
- Fully declarative Kotlin code for UI
- No view hierarchy or findViewById()
- Layout composables handle optimization automatically
- UI, styling, and logic in one place
- Simple list creation with LazyColumn/LazyRow
- No layout inflation, faster rendering
Compose brings significant advantages in:
- Code reduction: Much less boilerplate code compared to XML
- State management: Built-in state handling with react-like patterns
- Preview: @Preview annotation for seeing UI changes without deploying
- Animation: Simplified animations with type-safe builders
- Testing: Better testability without complex UI testing setups
Migration can be gradual - Compose can be adopted incrementally within existing XML-based apps through the ComposeView component.